Bryq vs TestGorillacomparison page hero with pre-employment assessment headline

AI Competency
Assessment and Framework

Most AI competency frameworks live on slides. Bryq's is a working measurement instrument, grounded in UNESCO, SFIA, and OECD research, used by HR, TA, and L&D teams to score AI competency against actual roles. Same framework, same scoring, used for hiring and for the workforce you already have.

Bryq vs TestGorillacomparison page hero with pre-employment assessment headline

AI Competency
Assessment and Framework

Most AI competency frameworks live on slides. Bryq's is a working measurement instrument, grounded in UNESCO, SFIA, and OECD research, used by HR, TA, and L&D teams to score AI competency against actual roles. Same framework, same scoring, used for hiring and for the workforce you already have.

Bryq vs TestGorillacomparison page hero with pre-employment assessment headline

AI Competency
Assessment and Framework

Most AI competency frameworks live on slides. Bryq's is a working measurement instrument, grounded in UNESCO, SFIA, and OECD research, used by HR, TA, and L&D teams to score AI competency against actual roles. Same framework, same scoring, used for hiring and for the workforce you already have.

What is an AI competency framework?

What is an AI competency framework?

An AI competency framework is a structured model of the skills, knowledge, and behaviours that constitute capable AI use at work. It is more than a skills checklist. A competency is a skill plus the behaviours and knowledge that allow the skill to be applied effectively in a given role. Frameworks make competencies measurable: you can map a role's required competencies, score a person against them, identify gaps, and design development paths to close those gaps.


Frameworks differ from assessments. The framework describes the structure of capability. The assessment measures a person against it. Bryq publishes both. The five-dimension framework is the structural model; the AI Proficiency Assessment is the measurement instrument.

An AI competency framework is a structured model of the skills, knowledge, and behaviours that constitute capable AI use at work. It is more than a skills checklist. A competency is a skill plus the behaviours and knowledge that allow the skill to be applied effectively in a given role. Frameworks make competencies measurable: you can map a role's required competencies, score a person against them, identify gaps, and design development paths to close those gaps.


Frameworks differ from assessments. The framework describes the structure of capability. The assessment measures a person against it. Bryq publishes both. The five-dimension framework is the structural model; the AI Proficiency Assessment is the measurement instrument.

An AI competency framework is a structured model of the skills, knowledge, and behaviours that constitute capable AI use at work. It is more than a skills checklist. A competency is a skill plus the behaviours and knowledge that allow the skill to be applied effectively in a given role. Frameworks make competencies measurable: you can map a role's required competencies, score a person against them, identify gaps, and design development paths to close those gaps.


Frameworks differ from assessments. The framework describes the structure of capability. The assessment measures a person against it. Bryq publishes both. The five-dimension framework is the structural model; the AI Proficiency Assessment is the measurement instrument.

Three frameworks Bryq's model is grounded in

Three frameworks Bryq's model is grounded in

Bryq's framework integrates published competency research from three sources. We do not claim to have invented the structure. We adapted recognised frameworks for the specific use case of measuring applied AI capability in hiring and workforce contexts.

Bryq's framework integrates published competency research from three sources. We do not claim to have invented the structure. We adapted recognised frameworks for the specific use case of measuring applied AI capability in hiring and workforce contexts.

Bryq's framework integrates published competency research from three sources. We do not claim to have invented the structure. We adapted recognised frameworks for the specific use case of measuring applied AI capability in hiring and workforce contexts.

Framework

Framework

Framework

What it covers

What it covers

What it covers

Where Bryq integrates it

Where Bryq integrates it

Where Bryq integrates it

Foundational AI literacy competencies for teachers and learners across cognitive, behavioural, and ethical domains

Foundational AI literacy competencies for teachers and learners across cognitive, behavioural, and ethical domains

Foundational AI literacy competencies for teachers and learners across cognitive, behavioural, and ethical domains

Informs the Ethical & Responsible Use and Critical Evaluation dimensions

Informs the Ethical & Responsible Use and Critical Evaluation dimensions

Informs the Ethical & Responsible Use and Critical Evaluation dimensions

Industry-standard digital skills framework including AI-related competencies at multiple proficiency levels

Industry-standard digital skills framework including AI-related competencies at multiple proficiency levels

Industry-standard digital skills framework including AI-related competencies at multiple proficiency levels

Informs the level-progression logic and the Workflow Integration dimension

Informs the level-progression logic and the Workflow Integration dimension

Informs the level-progression logic and the Workflow Integration dimension

Cross-country research on AI capability development in the workforce

Cross-country research on AI capability development in the workforce

Cross-country research on AI capability development in the workforce

Informs the cross-role applicability and the longitudinal measurement design

Informs the cross-role applicability and the longitudinal measurement design

Informs the cross-role applicability and the longitudinal measurement design

These three are the primary inputs. Bryq's framework also draws on three additional peer-reviewed research bodies in adjacent fields (industrial-organizational psychology, adult learning theory, and digital workforce research).

These three are the primary inputs. Bryq's framework also draws on three additional peer-reviewed research bodies in adjacent fields (industrial-organizational psychology, adult learning theory, and digital workforce research).

These three are the primary inputs. Bryq's framework also draws on three additional peer-reviewed research bodies in adjacent fields (industrial-organizational psychology, adult learning theory, and digital workforce research).

The five AI competencies Bryq measures

The five AI competencies Bryq measures

Dimension

Dimension

Dimension

What it measures

What it measures

What it measures

AI Task Strategy

What it

measures

AI Task Strategy

When and how to deploy AI in a workflow; recognising the right and wrong moments to use it.

When and how to deploy AI in a workflow; recognising the right and wrong moments to use it.

When and how to deploy AI in a workflow; recognising the right and wrong moments to use it.

Prompting & Interaction

Core

approach

Prompting & Interaction

Effective input design, iteration, and getting useful output from a generative system.

Effective input design, iteration, and getting useful output from a generative system.

Effective input design, iteration, and getting useful output from a generative system.

Critical Evaluation

AI

proficiency

Critical Evaluation

Spotting hallucinations, bias, factual errors, and weak outputs before they reach a decision.

Spotting hallucinations, bias, factual errors, and weak outputs before they reach a decision.

Spotting hallucinations, bias, factual errors, and weak outputs before they reach a decision.

Ethical & Responsible Use

Candidate

experience

Ethical & Responsible Use

Handling sensitive data, transparency to candidates, knowing what to escalate.

Handling sensitive data, transparency to candidates, knowing what to escalate.

Handling sensitive data, transparency to candidates, knowing what to escalate.

Workflow Integration

Candidate

experience

Workflow Integration

Embedding AI into real work without becoming dependent or losing judgement.

Embedding AI into real work without becoming dependent or losing judgement.

Embedding AI into real work without becoming dependent or losing judgement.

Each dimension is scored 0–100. The composite is mapped against a role-specific Ideal Candidate Profile that Bryq's AI builds from the role description. The output is a ranked shortlist with dimension-level insight, not a single opaque score.

Each dimension is scored 0–100. The composite is mapped against a role-specific Ideal Candidate Profile that Bryq's AI builds from the role description. The output is a ranked shortlist with dimension-level insight, not a single opaque score.

Each dimension is scored 0–100. The composite is mapped against a role-specific Ideal Candidate Profile that Bryq's AI builds from the role description. The output is a ranked shortlist with dimension-level insight, not a single opaque score.

How Bryq adapts the assessment to the role

Before running the assessment, you pick the proficiency level the role demands. Bryq then uses scenarios matched to that level. Scoring is always 0 to 100 across the five dimensions, no pass/fail.

One green star indicating the Aware proficiency level.

Aware

Roles where basic AI awareness is sufficient. Scenarios test whether the candidate can use AI tools for simple tasks, understand their limitations, and avoid common pitfalls.

Two green stars indicating the Functional proficiency level.

Functional

Roles where regular AI use is expected. Scenarios test whether the candidate can prompt AI tools effectively, evaluate outputs critically, and integrate AI into standard workflows.

Three green stars indicating the Advanced proficiency level.

Advanced

Roles requiring sophisticated AI application. Scenarios test whether the candidate can design complex AI workflows and evaluate AI opportunities strategically.

How to apply the framework

How to apply the framework

Hiring

Hiring

Use the assessment as a screening step in your existing ATS workflow. Bryq's AI builds an Ideal Candidate Profile from the role description, specifying the required level per dimension. Candidates complete the 15-minute assessment; the output is a ranked shortlist with dimension-level insight.

Use the assessment as a screening step in your existing ATS workflow. Bryq's AI builds an Ideal Candidate Profile from the role description, specifying the required level per dimension. Candidates complete the 15-minute assessment; the output is a ranked shortlist with dimension-level insight.

Use the assessment as a screening step in your existing ATS workflow. Bryq's AI builds an Ideal Candidate Profile from the role description, specifying the required level per dimension. Candidates complete the 15-minute assessment; the output is a ranked shortlist with dimension-level insight.

L&D programmes

L&D programmes

Use the framework as the backbone of an AI L&D programme. Baseline the workforce on the five dimensions. Identify the dimensions with the widest gap-to-role-required. Design targeted training. Re-baseline to measure progress. The data drives where you spend training budget.

Use the framework as the backbone of an AI L&D programme. Baseline the workforce on the five dimensions. Identify the dimensions with the widest gap-to-role-required. Design targeted training. Re-baseline to measure progress. The data drives where you spend training budget.

Use the framework as the backbone of an AI L&D programme. Baseline the workforce on the five dimensions. Identify the dimensions with the widest gap-to-role-required. Design targeted training. Re-baseline to measure progress. The data drives where you spend training budget.

Workforce capability mapping

Workforce capability mapping

Run the assessment across the workforce and produce a capability map by team or business unit. Identify roles where the dimension-required-vs-dimension-actual gap is largest. Inform strategic workforce planning. Feed into succession planning and internal mobility.

Run the assessment across the workforce and produce a capability map by team or business unit. Identify roles where the dimension-required-vs-dimension-actual gap is largest. Inform strategic workforce planning. Feed into succession planning and internal mobility.

Run the assessment across the workforce and produce a capability map by team or business unit. Identify roles where the dimension-required-vs-dimension-actual gap is largest. Inform strategic workforce planning. Feed into succession planning and internal mobility.

Bryq's framework vs other AI-skills frameworks

Honest cross-reference. Where Bryq's framework aligns with other published frameworks, we say so. Where Bryq adds something the others do not, we say that too.

UNESCO AI Competency Framework, extensive on cognitive and ethical dimensions, lighter on applied workflow integration. Bryq adds the Workflow Integration and AI Task Strategy dimensions for workplace use.

SFIA v9 is strong on level structure and proficiency progression. Bryq adapts the level structure and adds AI-specific behavioural descriptions.

OECD AI capability research, strong on cross-country and longitudinal measurement; less prescriptive on individual-level scoring. Bryq operationalises individual scoring while preserving the cross-role applicability.

LinkedIn AI Aptitude and similar commercial frameworks, proprietary and often focused on skill-counting rather than applied competency. Bryq measures applied capability, not skill inventories.

Implementation guide

Implementation guide

A typical four-phase rollout for a competency-based AI programme:

A typical four-phase rollout for a competency-based AI programme:

A typical four-phase rollout for a competency-based AI programme:

1.

1.

Baseline measurement. Run the assessment across the in-scope population. Establish a current-state capability map.

Baseline measurement. Run the assessment across the in-scope population. Establish a current-state capability map.

Baseline measurement. Run the assessment across the in-scope population. Establish a current-state capability map.

2.

2.

Gap analysis. Identify the dimensions with the largest gap-to-required across the in-scope roles. Prioritise based on business impact.

Gap analysis. Identify the dimensions with the largest gap-to-required across the in-scope roles. Prioritise based on business impact.

Gap analysis. Identify the dimensions with the largest gap-to-required across the in-scope roles. Prioritise based on business impact.

3.

3.

Targeted intervention. Design training, tooling changes, or hiring adjustments to close the priority gaps. Avoid generic AI training; the data tells you what specific dimensions need attention.

Targeted intervention. Design training, tooling changes, or hiring adjustments to close the priority gaps. Avoid generic AI training; the data tells you what specific dimensions need attention.

Targeted intervention. Design training, tooling changes, or hiring adjustments to close the priority gaps. Avoid generic AI training; the data tells you what specific dimensions need attention.

4.

4.

Re-measurement. Run the assessment again after 6–9 months. Measure progress. Adjust the programme.

Re-measurement. Run the assessment again after 6–9 months. Measure progress. Adjust the programme.

Re-measurement. Run the assessment again after 6–9 months. Measure progress. Adjust the programme.

Most teams complete phase 1 in two to four weeks. Phases 2–3 vary widely; phase 4 should be on an annual or biannual cycle.

Most teams complete phase 1 in two to four weeks. Phases 2–3 vary widely; phase 4 should be on an annual or biannual cycle.

Most teams complete phase 1 in two to four weeks. Phases 2–3 vary widely; phase 4 should be on an annual or biannual cycle.

Customer evidence

Major businesses run the framework for capability mapping at infrastructure scale. Other clients use it for government-tech competency baselining. An AI-native customer applies it for L&D programme design. Across the 140+ teams using Bryq globally: 3x improvement in quality of hire, 47% lower attrition, 2x faster hiring.

Results measured across Bryq customer engagements. Individual outcomes vary by role, industry, and baseline hiring maturity.

Get started

Book a demo to see the assessment and a sample dimension-level output

Book a demo to see the assessment and a sample dimension-level output

Book a demo to see the assessment and a sample dimension-level output

Talk to a Bryq I/O psychologist on the team if you want a deeper conversation on framework design and validation

Talk to a Bryq I/O psychologist on the team if you want a deeper conversation on framework design and validation

Talk to a Bryq I/O psychologist on the team if you want a deeper conversation on framework design and validation

Ready to Measure AI Proficiency?

Book a 30-minute demo. We’ll build your first AI Proficiency profile on the call, for a role you're hiring or a team you want to assess.

Ready to Measure AI Proficiency?

Start hiring based on

real data.

Ready to Measure AI Proficiency?

Book a 30-minute demo. We’ll build your first AI Proficiency profile on the call, for a role you're hiring or a team you want to assess.

FAQ

Find answers to the most frequently asked questions

Skills are specific capabilities ("can prompt an LLM," "can evaluate AI output for hallucination"). Competencies are structured frameworks that group skills, behaviours, and knowledge into measurable domains. A competency framework gives you the structure to compare people, design development paths, and measure progress over time.
The framework structure is documented in Bryq's methodology paper, available on request. The underlying research foundations. UNESCO AI Competency Framework, SFIA v9, OECD AI capability research, are publicly published. The Bryq-specific integration is shared with prospects and customers as part of the standard methodology pack.
The framework's structural design is publicly described and grounded in publicly published research. Teams can use the dimensions to inform their own development plans, with or without Bryq. The operationalisation as a scored, validated assessment is Bryq's product; the conceptual structure is not proprietary in any meaningful sense.
You pick one of three proficiency levels for the role: Aware, Functional, or Advanced. Bryq then runs scenarios matched to that level and scores the candidate 0 to 100 on each of the five dimensions. The Ideal Candidate Profile builds from the role description and your team's input on what good looks like.
Bryq revalidates the framework and updates assessment items as the underlying AI tooling evolves. The five-dimension structure is stable; the specific behaviours within each dimension shift over time. Validation documentation is available on request and is updated with each revalidation cycle.
Around 15 minutes per person, on average. The format is scenario-based and tool-agnostic, designed to measure practical decision-making rather than knowledge of terminology.
Yes. Bryq publishes the product under the name AI Proficiency Assessment. "AI competency assessment" is the term most often used by L&D and HR Ops buyers. The product is the same regardless of which term brings you here.
140+ teams globally, with named case studies including Roadrunner, Granicus, Trendsetter Homes, Metro Pacific Tollways, Global BPO, Hawkeye Innovations, AccountingProse, and Persado.