Bryq vs TestGorillacomparison page hero with pre-employment assessment headline

AI Literacy Assessment.
EU AI Act Article 4 Ready

Article 4 is already law and applies to your existing staff, not just new hires. Bryq's AI Literacy Assessment measures your full workforce (candidates and current employees) in five dimensions, validated by I/O psychologists, and produces records that support your audit programme.

Bryq vs TestGorillacomparison page hero with pre-employment assessment headline

AI Literacy Assessment.
EU AI Act Article 4 Ready

Article 4 is already law and applies to your existing staff, not just new hires. Bryq's AI Literacy Assessment measures your full workforce (candidates and current employees) in five dimensions, validated by I/O psychologists, and produces records that support your audit programme.

Bryq vs TestGorillacomparison page hero with pre-employment assessment headline

AI Literacy Assessment.
EU AI Act Article 4 Ready

Article 4 is already law and applies to your existing staff, not just new hires. Bryq's AI Literacy Assessment measures your full workforce (candidates and current employees) in five dimensions, validated by I/O psychologists, and produces records that support your audit programme.

What Article 4 requires

What Article 4 requires

Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 requires providers and deployers of AI systems used in the EU to "ensure, to their best extent, a sufficient level of AI literacy" among staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of those systems on their behalf. The duty has been in force since 2 February 2025. It applies regardless of the risk category of the tool, including embedded ATS features and generative tools used for everyday hiring tasks. (Source: Article 4 EU AI Act; AI Act Service Desk Article 4 page)


The European Commission's AI Office FAQ has been explicit on three points: there is no certification scheme; there is no one-size-fits-all training programme; and "sufficient" is calibrated to the role, the risk profile of the tool, and the people affected by its output. (Source: European Commission AI Literacy Q&A)

Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 requires providers and deployers of AI systems used in the EU to "ensure, to their best extent, a sufficient level of AI literacy" among staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of those systems on their behalf. The duty has been in force since 2 February 2025. It applies regardless of the risk category of the tool, including embedded ATS features and generative tools used for everyday hiring tasks. (Source: Article 4 EU AI Act; AI Act Service Desk Article 4 page)


The European Commission's AI Office FAQ has been explicit on three points: there is no certification scheme; there is no one-size-fits-all training programme; and "sufficient" is calibrated to the role, the risk profile of the tool, and the people affected by its output. (Source: European Commission AI Literacy Q&A)

Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 requires providers and deployers of AI systems used in the EU to "ensure, to their best extent, a sufficient level of AI literacy" among staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of those systems on their behalf. The duty has been in force since 2 February 2025. It applies regardless of the risk category of the tool, including embedded ATS features and generative tools used for everyday hiring tasks. (Source: Article 4 EU AI Act; AI Act Service Desk Article 4 page)


The European Commission's AI Office FAQ has been explicit on three points: there is no certification scheme; there is no one-size-fits-all training programme; and "sufficient" is calibrated to the role, the risk profile of the tool, and the people affected by its output. (Source: European Commission AI Literacy Q&A)

What the regulation actually says

What the regulation actually says

EU AI ACT, ARTICLE 3(56), VERBATIM DEFINITION

AI literacy means "the skills, knowledge and understanding that allow providers, deployers and affected persons, taking into account their respective rights and obligations in the context of this Regulation, to make an informed deployment of AI systems, as well as to gain awareness about the opportunities and risks of AI and possible harm it can cause." Source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 3(56)

AI literacy means "the skills, knowledge and understanding that allow providers, deployers and affected persons, taking into account their respective rights and obligations in the context of this Regulation, to make an informed deployment of AI systems, as well as to gain awareness about the opportunities and risks of AI and possible harm it can cause." Source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 3(56)

AI literacy means "the skills, knowledge and understanding that allow providers, deployers and affected persons, taking into account their respective rights and obligations in the context of this Regulation, to make an informed deployment of AI systems, as well as to gain awareness about the opportunities and risks of AI and possible harm it can cause." Source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 3(56)

We quote the regulation verbatim because the definition itself is the standard. Note three things in the wording: "taking into account respective rights and obligations" (literacy is role-relative), "informed deployment" (operational competence, not theoretical knowledge), and "awareness about opportunities and risks" (literacy includes critical evaluation, not just task execution). Bryq's five-dimension framework maps to all three.

That phrasing sounds soft. It is not. Under Article 99, a literacy failure can be cited as an aggravating factor in fines reaching up to €15 million or 3% of global annual turnover when something else goes wrong with a high-risk hiring tool. The standard scales with the role and the risk; the consequences do not.

We quote the regulation verbatim because the definition itself is the standard. Note three things in the wording: "taking into account respective rights and obligations" (literacy is role-relative), "informed deployment" (operational competence, not theoretical knowledge), and "awareness about opportunities and risks" (literacy includes critical evaluation, not just task execution). Bryq's five-dimension framework maps to all three.

That phrasing sounds soft. It is not. Under Article 99, a literacy failure can be cited as an aggravating factor in fines reaching up to €15 million or 3% of global annual turnover when something else goes wrong with a high-risk hiring tool. The standard scales with the role and the risk; the consequences do not.

We quote the regulation verbatim because the definition itself is the standard. Note three things in the wording: "taking into account respective rights and obligations" (literacy is role-relative), "informed deployment" (operational competence, not theoretical knowledge), and "awareness about opportunities and risks" (literacy includes critical evaluation, not just task execution). Bryq's five-dimension framework maps to all three.

That phrasing sounds soft. It is not. Under Article 99, a literacy failure can be cited as an aggravating factor in fines reaching up to €15 million or 3% of global annual turnover when something else goes wrong with a high-risk hiring tool. The standard scales with the role and the risk; the consequences do not.

What "sufficient AI literacy" means in practice

What "sufficient AI literacy" means in practice

The Commission's guidance points at four things, in order:

The Commission's guidance points at four things, in order:

The Commission's guidance points at four things, in order:

1.

1.

Map your AI in hiring. A written inventory of every AI tool used in the recruitment workflow, including embedded ATS features and generative tools used for tasks like drafting job ads.

Map your AI in hiring. A written inventory of every AI tool used in the recruitment workflow, including embedded ATS features and generative tools used for tasks like drafting job ads.

Map your AI in hiring. A written inventory of every AI tool used in the recruitment workflow, including embedded ATS features and generative tools used for tasks like drafting job ads.

2.

2.

Match roles to systems. For each tool, list who uses it, who relies on its output, and who is responsible for overriding it. Recruiters, hiring managers, HR business partners, and external sourcing agencies acting on your behalf are all in scope.

Match roles to systems. For each tool, list who uses it, who relies on its output, and who is responsible for overriding it. Recruiters, hiring managers, HR business partners, and external sourcing agencies acting on your behalf are all in scope.

Match roles to systems. For each tool, list who uses it, who relies on its output, and who is responsible for overriding it. Recruiters, hiring managers, HR business partners, and external sourcing agencies acting on your behalf are all in scope.

3.

3.

Differentiate the literacy you provide. One generic e-learning module sent to all of HR is not what regulators have in mind. The Commission's word for what they expect is "tailored"; in practice that means role-specific training tracks.

Differentiate the literacy you provide. One generic e-learning module sent to all of HR is not what regulators have in mind. The Commission's word for what they expect is "tailored"; in practice that means role-specific training tracks.

Differentiate the literacy you provide. One generic e-learning module sent to all of HR is not what regulators have in mind. The Commission's word for what they expect is "tailored"; in practice that means role-specific training tracks.

4.

4.

Document everything. A training register, the materials and syllabi used, simple competency checks or attestations, and a review cadence showing how training is updated as tools change.

Document everything. A training register, the materials and syllabi used, simple competency checks or attestations, and a review cadence showing how training is updated as tools change.

Document everything. A training register, the materials and syllabi used, simple competency checks or attestations, and a review cadence showing how training is updated as tools change.

Bryq sits on step three (differentiating literacy by role) and step four (documenting evidence). It is not a substitute for steps one and two, which sit with the organisation. The Commission has been clear that no single tool grants a presumption of Article 4 compliance.

Bryq sits on step three (differentiating literacy by role) and step four (documenting evidence). It is not a substitute for steps one and two, which sit with the organisation. The Commission has been clear that no single tool grants a presumption of Article 4 compliance.

Bryq sits on step three (differentiating literacy by role) and step four (documenting evidence). It is not a substitute for steps one and two, which sit with the organisation. The Commission has been clear that no single tool grants a presumption of Article 4 compliance.

How Bryq's AI Literacy Assessment maps to Article 4 requirements

How Bryq's AI Literacy Assessment maps to Article 4 requirements

Bryq measures the literacy of your workforce in five dimensions, scored 0–100, built on six peer-reviewed research frameworks including UNESCO's AI Competency Framework, SFIA v9, and OECD AI literacy work. Each candidate or employee completes the assessment in around 15 minutes, in scenarios that look like the work, not as a knowledge quiz.


The five dimensions and the corresponding Article 4 expectations:

Bryq measures the literacy of your workforce in five dimensions, scored 0–100, built on six peer-reviewed research frameworks including UNESCO's AI Competency Framework, SFIA v9, and OECD AI literacy work. Each candidate or employee completes the assessment in around 15 minutes, in scenarios that look like the work, not as a knowledge quiz.


The five dimensions and the corresponding Article 4 expectations:

Bryq measures the literacy of your workforce in five dimensions, scored 0–100, built on six peer-reviewed research frameworks including UNESCO's AI Competency Framework, SFIA v9, and OECD AI literacy work. Each candidate or employee completes the assessment in around 15 minutes, in scenarios that look like the work, not as a knowledge quiz.


The five dimensions and the corresponding Article 4 expectations:

Dimension

Dimension

Dimension

What it measures

What it measures

What it measures

AI Task Strategy

What it

measures

AI Task Strategy

Understanding when and how to deploy AI; recognising the limits of AI in a given workflow

Understanding when and how to deploy AI; recognising the limits of AI in a given workflow

Understanding when and how to deploy AI; recognising the limits of AI in a given workflow

Prompting & Interaction

Core

approach

Prompting & Interaction

Operational use of AI tools; producing useful output from generative systems

Operational use of AI tools; producing useful output from generative systems

Operational use of AI tools; producing useful output from generative systems

Critical Evaluation

AI

proficiency

Critical Evaluation

Spotting bias, hallucination, and factual errors before they reach a decision; meaningful human oversight

Spotting bias, hallucination, and factual errors before they reach a decision; meaningful human oversight

Spotting bias, hallucination, and factual errors before they reach a decision; meaningful human oversight

Ethical & Responsible Use

Candidate

experience

Ethical & Responsible Use

Handling sensitive data; candidate transparency; knowing what to escalate; data-protection awareness

Handling sensitive data; candidate transparency; knowing what to escalate; data-protection awareness

Handling sensitive data; candidate transparency; knowing what to escalate; data-protection awareness

Workflow Integration

Candidate

experience

Workflow Integration

Embedding AI into hiring without becoming dependent or losing professional judgement

Embedding AI into hiring without becoming dependent or losing professional judgement

Embedding AI into hiring without becoming dependent or losing professional judgement

Audit-ready scoring and documentation

Audit-ready scoring and documentation

The assessment produces structured records you can include in your Article 4 audit file. Specifically:

The assessment produces structured records you can include in your Article 4 audit file. Specifically:

The assessment produces structured records you can include in your Article 4 audit file. Specifically:

Per-employee scores across the five dimensions, with date and role group attached

Per-employee scores across the five dimensions, with date and role group attached

Per-employee scores across the five dimensions, with date and role group attached

Aggregate workforce distribution by dimension, segmented by team or business unit

Aggregate workforce distribution by dimension, segmented by team or business unit

Aggregate workforce distribution by dimension, segmented by team or business unit

Re-assessment records for tracking literacy as your tools and team change

Re-assessment records for tracking literacy as your tools and team change

Re-assessment records for tracking literacy as your tools and team change

A methodology note covering the five dimensions and the research frameworks behind them

A methodology note covering the five dimensions and the research frameworks behind them

A methodology note covering the five dimensions and the research frameworks behind them

Tool-agnostic format, the assessment does not test any one vendor's product, which means the record holds as your AI stack evolves

Tool-agnostic format, the assessment does not test any one vendor's product, which means the record holds as your AI stack evolves

Tool-agnostic format, the assessment does not test any one vendor's product, which means the record holds as your AI stack evolves

The records are one component of an Article 4 audit file. They do not stand in for the rest of the programme, the policy, the training delivery, the override protocols, the works council engagement, which sits with you.

The records are one component of an Article 4 audit file. They do not stand in for the rest of the programme, the policy, the training delivery, the override protocols, the works council engagement, which sits with you.

The records are one component of an Article 4 audit file. They do not stand in for the rest of the programme, the policy, the training delivery, the override protocols, the works council engagement, which sits with you.

For Legal and Compliance: defensibility, audit trails, retention

For Legal and Compliance: defensibility, audit trails, retention

Three things the Compliance team typically asks about:

Three things the Compliance team typically asks about:

Three things the Compliance team typically asks about:

Defensibility

Defensibility

The assessment is grounded in published competency research (UNESCO, SFIA, OECD), administered consistently across the workforce, validated by I/O psychologists, and dimension-level scored. It is structured, repeatable, and explainable, the three things an auditor will want to see in your literacy evidence.

The assessment is grounded in published competency research (UNESCO, SFIA, OECD), administered consistently across the workforce, validated by I/O psychologists, and dimension-level scored. It is structured, repeatable, and explainable, the three things an auditor will want to see in your literacy evidence.

The assessment is grounded in published competency research (UNESCO, SFIA, OECD), administered consistently across the workforce, validated by I/O psychologists, and dimension-level scored. It is structured, repeatable, and explainable, the three things an auditor will want to see in your literacy evidence.

Audit trail

Audit trail

The exported records include candidate or employee identifier, role group, dimension scores, composite score, assessment date, and methodology version. Bryq retains the records for the period agreed in your Data Processing Agreement; you can export the full record set on demand.

The exported records include candidate or employee identifier, role group, dimension scores, composite score, assessment date, and methodology version. Bryq retains the records for the period agreed in your Data Processing Agreement; you can export the full record set on demand.

The exported records include candidate or employee identifier, role group, dimension scores, composite score, assessment date, and methodology version. Bryq retains the records for the period agreed in your Data Processing Agreement; you can export the full record set on demand.

Interaction with GDPR

Interaction with GDPR

The assessment processes personal data. Bryq operates as a processor under your instruction; the legal basis for the processing sits with you, typically legitimate interest for employee assessment or contractual necessity for candidate assessment. The DPA addresses retention, sub-processors, transfers, and data-subject rights.

The assessment processes personal data. Bryq operates as a processor under your instruction; the legal basis for the processing sits with you, typically legitimate interest for employee assessment or contractual necessity for candidate assessment. The DPA addresses retention, sub-processors, transfers, and data-subject rights.

The assessment processes personal data. Bryq operates as a processor under your instruction; the legal basis for the processing sits with you, typically legitimate interest for employee assessment or contractual necessity for candidate assessment. The DPA addresses retention, sub-processors, transfers, and data-subject rights.

AI literacy and the candidate experience

AI literacy and the candidate experience

When AI literacy assessment is used in hiring, candidates have rights under both EU AI Act and GDPR. Bryq's candidate experience is designed around three principles:

When AI literacy assessment is used in hiring, candidates have rights under both EU AI Act and GDPR. Bryq's candidate experience is designed around three principles:

When AI literacy assessment is used in hiring, candidates have rights under both EU AI Act and GDPR. Bryq's candidate experience is designed around three principles:

Transparency

Transparency

Candidates are told what is being measured, why, and how the results are used. They are not subjected to opaque AI scoring.

Candidates are told what is being measured, why, and how the results are used. They are not subjected to opaque AI scoring.

Candidates are told what is being measured, why, and how the results are used. They are not subjected to opaque AI scoring.

Fairness

Fairness

Bryq's assessments are tested for adverse impact across demographic groups. Where adverse impact is detected, the item or methodology is revised. Documentation is available to deployers as part of the vendor diligence pack.

Bryq's assessments are tested for adverse impact across demographic groups. Where adverse impact is detected, the item or methodology is revised. Documentation is available to deployers as part of the vendor diligence pack.

Bryq's assessments are tested for adverse impact across demographic groups. Where adverse impact is detected, the item or methodology is revised. Documentation is available to deployers as part of the vendor diligence pack.

Proportionality

Proportionality

The assessment takes around 15 minutes and is calibrated to the role. Candidates are not asked to perform tasks unrelated to the work.

The assessment takes around 15 minutes and is calibrated to the role. Candidates are not asked to perform tasks unrelated to the work.

The assessment takes around 15 minutes and is calibrated to the role. Candidates are not asked to perform tasks unrelated to the work.

What Bryq does and does not provide

What Bryq does and does not provide

Bryq is one component of an Article 4 programme. We measure the literacy of your workforce in a structured, defensible way and produce records you can put in your audit file. The rest of the programme, policies, training delivery, override protocols, works council engagement, sits with you. The Commission has been explicit that no single tool grants a presumption of compliance, and we mirror that.


Bryq does provide:

Bryq is one component of an Article 4 programme. We measure the literacy of your workforce in a structured, defensible way and produce records you can put in your audit file. The rest of the programme, policies, training delivery, override protocols, works council engagement, sits with you. The Commission has been explicit that no single tool grants a presumption of compliance, and we mirror that.


Bryq does provide:

Bryq is one component of an Article 4 programme. We measure the literacy of your workforce in a structured, defensible way and produce records you can put in your audit file. The rest of the programme, policies, training delivery, override protocols, works council engagement, sits with you. The Commission has been explicit that no single tool grants a presumption of compliance, and we mirror that.


Bryq does provide:

Scored, dimension-level measurement of AI literacy across your workforce

Scored, dimension-level measurement of AI literacy across your workforce

Scored, dimension-level measurement of AI literacy across your workforce

Tool-agnostic, role-relative scoring against an Ideal Candidate Profile

Tool-agnostic, role-relative scoring against an Ideal Candidate Profile

Tool-agnostic, role-relative scoring against an Ideal Candidate Profile

Exportable records that support the documentation requirement under Article 4

Exportable records that support the documentation requirement under Article 4

Exportable records that support the documentation requirement under Article 4

Vendor diligence documentation reflecting Bryq's own status as a high-risk AI system under Annex III(4)(a)

Vendor diligence documentation reflecting Bryq's own status as a high-risk AI system under Annex III(4)(a)

Vendor diligence documentation reflecting Bryq's own status as a high-risk AI system under Annex III(4)(a)

Bryq does not provide:

Bryq does not provide:

Bryq does not provide:

Legal opinion on your specific Article 4 deployment

Legal opinion on your specific Article 4 deployment

Legal opinion on your specific Article 4 deployment

A presumption of Article 4 compliance

A presumption of Article 4 compliance

A presumption of Article 4 compliance

Training delivery (the assessment measures what training and experience have produced; it does not deliver the training itself)

Training delivery (the assessment measures what training and experience have produced; it does not deliver the training itself)

Training delivery (the assessment measures what training and experience have produced; it does not deliver the training itself)

Works council consultation; that conversation sits with you and your local counsel

Works council consultation; that conversation sits with you and your local counsel

Works council consultation; that conversation sits with you and your local counsel

A note on Bryq's own classification

A note on Bryq's own classification

Bryq's AI Proficiency Assessment uses AI in candidate evaluation. Under a strict reading of Annex III(4)(a) of the EU AI Act, that places it within the high-risk category. We treat Bryq as a provider of a high-risk AI system under Chapter III and meet the corresponding obligations: documented risk management, representative training data, technical documentation, logging, transparency to deployers, and built-in support for human oversight. When you run vendor diligence as part of your own Article 4 programme, ask for these. We provide them.

Bryq's AI Proficiency Assessment uses AI in candidate evaluation. Under a strict reading of Annex III(4)(a) of the EU AI Act, that places it within the high-risk category. We treat Bryq as a provider of a high-risk AI system under Chapter III and meet the corresponding obligations: documented risk management, representative training data, technical documentation, logging, transparency to deployers, and built-in support for human oversight. When you run vendor diligence as part of your own Article 4 programme, ask for these. We provide them.

Bryq's AI Proficiency Assessment uses AI in candidate evaluation. Under a strict reading of Annex III(4)(a) of the EU AI Act, that places it within the high-risk category. We treat Bryq as a provider of a high-risk AI system under Chapter III and meet the corresponding obligations: documented risk management, representative training data, technical documentation, logging, transparency to deployers, and built-in support for human oversight. When you run vendor diligence as part of your own Article 4 programme, ask for these. We provide them.

Ready to Measure AI Proficiency?

Book a 30-minute demo. We’ll build your first AI Proficiency profile on the call, for a role you're hiring or a team you want to assess.

Ready to Measure AI Proficiency?

Start hiring based on

real data.

Ready to Measure AI Proficiency?

Book a 30-minute demo. We’ll build your first AI Proficiency profile on the call, for a role you're hiring or a team you want to assess.

FAQ

Find answers to the most frequently asked questions

Article 4 requires that providers and deployers of AI systems take measures to ensure, to their best extent, a sufficient level of AI literacy among staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems on their behalf. The standard scales with the role, the risk profile of the tool, and the people affected by its output. There is no certification scheme and no one-size-fits-all training requirement. (Sources: Article 4 EU AI Act; European Commission AI Literacy Q&A; AI Act Service Desk Article 4 page)
No. Article 4 is a programme obligation: inventory, role mapping, training, governance, and documentation. Bryq is one component of that programme. We measure the literacy of your workforce in a structured, defensible way and produce records you can put in your audit file. The rest of the programme sits with you. The European Commission has been explicit that no single tool grants a presumption of Article 4 compliance. (Sources: Article 4 EU AI Act; European Commission AI Literacy FAQ)
Article 4 applies to staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems on the deployer's behalf. In practice, that means anyone whose role includes interacting with AI tooling. For hiring teams, that usually includes recruiters, hiring managers, HR business partners, HR Operations, HR leadership, and external sourcing agencies. National supervisory authorities including Germany's Bundesnetzagentur and Austria's RTR have stressed that the standard scales with the role and risk.
Bryq exports records covering per-employee dimension scores, role group, date of assessment, and methodology version. Aggregate workforce reports show distribution by team or business unit. These records support the documentation requirement under Article 4. They sit alongside your training register, policy, materials, and review cadence in the audit binder. There is no fixed template for the binder; what the Commission and national supervisors expect is records that show your programme is structured, repeatable, and updated as your tools change.
They overlap significantly. AI literacy is the regulatory term used in the EU AI Act; AI proficiency is the practical-performance term Bryq uses for the product. Both describe the same underlying capability. The assessment is the same regardless of which term brings you here. See our disambiguation guide for the full mapping across AI literacy, AI proficiency, AI fluency, AI readiness, AI skills, and AI competency.
Article 4 itself has been in force since 2 February 2025; the duty applies now. Enforcement of broader high-risk obligations was originally scheduled for 2 August 2026; a Digital Omnibus on AI under discussion in 2026 may push the Annex III high-risk application date to 2 December 2027, but as of writing this remains a political agreement and not yet adopted law. Article 4 itself is not affected by the proposed delay. Confirm the current status with your counsel before drafting any binder language. (Sources: AI Act Service Desk implementation timeline; European Parliament Legislative Train file 2025/0359(COD))
Yes. Bryq's AI Proficiency Assessment is used in candidate evaluation, which falls within Annex III, point 4(a) of the EU AI Act. We operate as a provider of a high-risk AI system under Chapter III and meet the corresponding obligations: documented risk management, representative training data, technical documentation, logging, transparency to deployers, and human-oversight features. The vendor diligence pack is available on request as part of your own Article 4 programme.
Yes. The same assessment runs for hiring, internal upskilling, and workforce-readiness baselining. The legal basis differs by use case, candidate assessment typically relies on contractual necessity or legitimate interest; employee assessment commonly on legitimate interest with appropriate notice. The DPA covers both.