AI Fluency Assessment:

measure how candidates really work with AI

AI Fluency Assessment:

measure how candidates really work with AI

AI Fluency Assessment:

measure how candidates really work with AI

Your candidates use AI every day. You have no idea how well. Bryq's AI Fluency Assessment measures how someone actually works with AI, across any role and any tool, in about 15 minutes. Not a quiz. Not a self-rating. A five-dimension profile you can hire on.

Your candidates use AI every day. You have no idea how well. Bryq's AI Fluency Assessment measures how someone actually works with AI, across any role and any tool, in about 15 minutes. Not a quiz. Not a self-rating. A five-dimension profile you can hire on.

Bryq AI Fluency Assessment five-dimension candidate profile

Why AI fluency is now a hiring signal

75% of knowledge workers already use AI at work, yet almost no hiring team can tell a real multiplier from someone who pastes a prompt into ChatGPT and ships whatever comes back. That gap is expensive. Half of employers say AI skills gaps are their top barrier to AI adoption, and the skill is cheapest to get right at the hire, not months later.


AI fluency is a hard skill now, alongside Excel and data analysis in what decides whether a new hire performs. You do not have to make it a requirement. But if you are not measuring it, you are guessing on a skill most of your people use every day.

5 Dimensions of AI Fluency

Our assessment evaluates the complete lifecycle of working with AI, from knowing when to use it, through getting results, to delivering work you can stand behind.

  1. AI Task Strategy

Knowing when to use AI — and when not to. Can they assess a task and decide what to delegate versus keep human?

  1. Prompting & Interaction Quality

Getting results from AI tools. Can they write effective prompts and iterate when the first attempt doesn't land?

  1. Critical Evaluation & Validation

Spotting what AI gets wrong. Can they catch errors, hallucinations, and gaps before those reach real work?

  1. Ethical & Responsible Use

Using AI without creating risk. Do they understand privacy, bias, IP, and regulatory boundaries?

  1. Workflow Integration & Output Quality

Turning AI output into professional work. Can they edit, synthesise, and combine AI content with original thinking?

Three fluency levels, matched to the role

Not every role needs the same level. An admin hire and a strategy hire face different AI demands, so the assessment reads against three levels.

One green star indicating the Aware proficiency level.
One green star indicating the Aware proficiency level.

Aware

Admin, entry-level, support

Basic AI awareness, simple tasks, avoids the common traps

Two green stars indicating the Functional proficiency level.
Two green stars indicating the Functional proficiency level.

Functional

Marketing, finance, ops, HR

Prompts well, evaluates output critically, fits AI into the workflow

Three green stars indicating the Advanced proficiency level.
Three green stars indicating the Advanced proficiency level.

Advanced

Strategy, leadership, AI-adjacent roles

Runs complex workflows, handles governance, guides others in responsible use

You set the level the role needs. The profile tells you where the candidate actually lands.

AI fluency versus AI knowledge tests

Most "AI assessments" on the market test what a candidate knows. They ask for definitions. What is a hallucination, what is a token, name three prompt techniques. Someone can ace that and still produce sloppy, unchecked work the moment they open a real tool.


Bryq measures what a candidate does. Simulation-based, on realistic tasks, tool-agnostic. Knowing what a hallucination is and catching one in a client deliverable before it goes out are two different skills. We test the second one.

AI knowledge quiz

Bryq AI Fluency Assessment

What it tests

Recall of terms and facts

Behavior on realistic tasks

Format

Multiple choice

Simulation-based, five scored dimensions

Tool dependence

Often tied to one tool

Tool-agnostic, measures transferable skill

Output

A single score or pass/fail

A 0 to 100 profile across five dimensions

What it predicts

Whether they studied

Whether they can actually do the work

COMPETITORS

Developer-focused tools

Test ML engineering, model deployment, and coding skills. Great for hiring data scientists. Irrelevant for 95% of your workforce.

AI literacy quizzes

Test whether someone can define "hallucination." Knowing the vocabulary doesn't mean they can do the work.

Tool-specific assessments

Test proficiency with one product. That product updates next quarter. The skills become obsolete.

BRYQ

Bryq AI Fluency Assessment

Measures how people actually work with AI in a realistic simulation. Tool-agnostic. Role-universal. Built on peer-reviewed research.

Three overlapping Bryq assessment question cards illustrating realistic business scenarios

Built on peer-reviewed research, not a proprietary question bank

Built on peer-reviewed research, not a proprietary question bank

The assessment is built on six peer-reviewed research frameworks, including UNESCO, SFIA, and OECD competency models. That matters for two reasons. Defensibility, because a hiring signal you cannot explain is a legal risk. And durability, because tools change and the underlying skills do not. We test critical evaluation, task delegation, ethical judgment, and output quality. Those hold whether the tool is ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or whatever ships next quarter. We update the simulation. The framework stays put.


The AI Fluency Assessment is one hard-skills module inside the wider Bryq platform, which measures cognitive ability, behavioral traits, and hard skills in one integrated candidate profile, validated by I/O psychologists. Teams that hire on measured fit instead of gut feel see a 3x improvement in quality of hire, 47% lower attrition, and 2x faster hiring.

Built on Science,
Not Guesswork

Our competency framework synthesises six peer-reviewed research sources spanning international government frameworks, academic competency models, and policy-grade workforce research.


Each dimension is grounded in established AI literacy and digital skills scholarship — not invented in a product sprint.

 

The result: a measurement instrument built on the most rigorous AI fluency research available, validated through established psychometric methods.

Diagram showing the six research sources behind Bryq's competency framework

How it works for your team

You do not run a separate tool. If you already use Bryq, the AI Fluency Assessment turns on from your dashboard and works inside your existing ATS integration. Add it to a role in a couple of clicks.

  • About 15 minutes for the candidate. Thorough, but it respects their time.

  • Dimension-level scores, 0 to 100, no pass or fail.

  • Tool-agnostic, so the result travels across roles and tools.

  • Included in your Bryq plan. No add-on, no premium tier.

  • Live inside your current ATS workflow, not a new system to roll out.

For TA leaders, the practical win is simple. Your best candidates get snapped up in about 10 days, so every interview slot has to count. When AI fluency is on the profile before the interview, you stop spending cycles finding out in person what a 15-minute assessment could have told you upfront.

Built for Talent Decisions. Designed by Science.

MCQ AI fluency advanced assessment card
MCQ AI fluency functional assessment card
Simulation AI fluencyassessment card

Step 1: Choose the fluency level

Pick the fluency level the role requires: Aware, Functional, or Advanced. Each level has its own simulation matched to the AI competency expected, whether you're screening a new hire or benchmarking a current employee.

Step 2: Candidates work through a simulation

No trivia. No textbook definitions. Candidates work through a realistic, simulation-based task and use AI the way they would on the job. Bryq scores what they actually do, not what they can define. About 15 minutes.

A Bryq assessment question showing a realistic business scenario about AI model confidence scores
Icons representing Bryq assessment features including communication, evaluation, security, and collaboration
A Bryq assessment question showing a realistic business scenario about AI model confidence scores
Icons representing Bryq assessment features including communication, evaluation, security, and collaboration
Bryq dimension score card for Critical Evaluation
Bryq dimension score card for Prompting and Interaction Quality
Bryq dimension score card for Critical Evaluation
Bryq dimension score card for Prompting and Interaction Quality

Step 3: Get dimension-level insights

Get a detailed fluency profile with scores across all five dimensions, 0 to 100. See exactly where each person excels and where the gaps are. No pass/fail binary. Use it to make a hiring call, plan targeted upskilling, or both.

Ready to see Bryq in action?

Start making talent decisions based on real data.

Ready to see Bryq in action?

Start hiring based on

real data.

Ready to see Bryq in action?

Start making talent decisions based on real data.

FAQ

Find answers to the most frequently asked questions about Bryq

An AI fluency assessment measures how well someone works with AI on real tasks: what they delegate to it, how they prompt, whether they catch its errors, and how they turn its output into finished work. It measures behavior, not recall.
The terms overlap and buyers use them interchangeably. Bryq treats AI fluency, AI proficiency, AI literacy, and AI competency as the same underlying question: can this person work effectively with AI? What separates a real assessment from a quiz is whether it measures behavior on simulations or just tests definitions.
Yes. Simulation-based assessment scores what a candidate does on realistic tasks against published research frameworks, rather than relying on a self-rating or an interview impression. That is what makes the signal defensible.
About 15 minutes. It produces a five-dimension profile scored 0 to 100, not a pass or fail.
No. It is tool-agnostic. It measures transferable skills like critical evaluation and task delegation, so the result holds no matter which tool the candidate uses on the job.
For teams hiring in the EU, the assessment gives documented, auditable evidence of how candidates were evaluated, which supports the Article 4 AI literacy obligation. Talk to us about your specific compliance needs.